MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080918196 · doi:10.1503/cjs.020712

Identification and use of operating room efficiency indicators: the problem of definition

2013· article· en· W2080918196 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Tamás Fixler, James G. Wright

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Surgery · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenAdlerIBM (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIdentification (biology)Balanced scorecardMeasure (data warehouse)Performance indicatorRisk analysis (engineering)Operations managementProcess managementData miningComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To measure operating room (OR) performance and efficiency, hospitals need scorecards or dashboards displaying and tracking core performance indicators.[1][1]–[3][2] Scorecards should be monitored on an ongoing basis and benchmarked both internally against performance over time and externally

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.152
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.291
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.802

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1520.291
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.001
Bibliometrics0.0130.015
Science and technology studies0.0040.016
Scholarly communication0.0130.023
Open science0.0110.010
Research integrity0.0080.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of SurgerySame topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesFrench-language works237,207