Correlating exchange bias with magnetic anisotropy in ion-beam bombarded NiFe/Mn-oxide bilayers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The exchange bias field dependence on the Mn-oxide and its microstructure in NiFe/Mn-oxide bilayers was investigated. Transmission electron microscopy results have shown that the bilayer bottom consisted of either α-Mn, rocksalt MnO, or a composite of tetragonal Mn3O4+MnO, depending on the ratio of O2/Ar used during dual ion-beam deposition. Magnetometry results at 5 K indicate that the exchange bias field (Hex∼−300 Oe) is largest in a NiFe/Mn (0%O2/Ar) bilayer. The MnO formation by in situ Mn oxidation results in a decrease in Hex in a NiFe/Mn-oxide (21%O2/Ar) bilayer. In contrast, a further increase in the O2/Ar ratio during deposition results in larger Hex and Hc. This is attributed to the oxidation of MnO into a harder ferrimagnet, Mn3O4. Our results indicate that the antiferromagnetic Mn enabled stronger coupling with NiFe than MnO. In addition, we find that the MnO–Mn3O4 coupling dominates the exchange bias effects at high oxygen concentrations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".