MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080955775 · doi:10.4138/2018

A Late Neoproterozoic age for the Caledonia Mountain Pluton, a high Ti-V layered gabbro in the Caledonia (Avalon) terrane, southern New Brunswick

2000· article· en· W2080955775 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Sandra M. Barr, Michael A. Hamilton, Chris E. White, Scott D. Samson

Bibliographic record

VenueAtlantic Geology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlutonGeologyZirconGabbroGeochemistryTerraneIgneous rockMaficBatholithPaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gabbro from the Caledonia Mountain Pluton in the northeastern Caledonian Highlands of southern New Brunswick yielded a U-Pb (zircon) crystallization age of 615 ± 1 Ma. The age shows that the Caledonia Mountain Pluton is co-genetic with its host metavolcanic rocks, significantly older than the Mechanic Settlement Pluton, and probably unrelated to the Lower Coverdalc ferrogabhro complex. The chemical characteristics of the pluton are consistent with those of mafic volcanic rocks in the arc-generated Broad River Group, with which the pluton is likely to be co-magmatic. However, the chemical compositions of the gabbroic samples show strong evidence for modification by processes of crystal fractionation and accumulation, and most are unlikely to reflect magmatic compositions. The epsilon Nd value of +3.7 indicates that, like other igneous rocks in the Caledonia terrane, the magma that formed (he Caledonia Mountain Pluton was not derived directly from depleted mantle, but had a component of older crust involved in its petrogenesis, either directly in the source area or by subsequent interaction with crustal materials, Elevated values of Ti, Fe, V, and P in the gabbro suggest that potential may exist for economic deposits, cither in the Caledonia Mountain Pluton or other similar bodies in the Caledonian Highlands RÉSUMÉ On a situé la cristallisation du gabbro du plulon du mont Caledonia dans le nord-est des collines calédoniennes du Sud du Nouveau-Brunswick a 615 ± 1 Ma par datation au U-Pb (à parlir de zircon). Cet âge révèle que le pluton du mont Caledonia est cogénétique avec ses roches métavolcaniques hôtcs, qui sont infiniment plus âgées que Ie pluton de Mechanic Settlement et qui ne sont probablement pas apparentiées au complexe de ferrogabbro de Lower Coverdale. Les caractéristiques chimiques du pluton correspondent à celles des roehes volcanomafiques du groupe formi par un arc de la riviére Broad, avec lequel le pluton est vraisemblablement comagmatique. Les compositions chimiques des échantillons gahbroiques afflchent toutefois des signes marqués de modifications en vertu de processus de fraclionnement el d'accumulation de cristaux. et la majorité ne devraient pas présenter de compositions magmatiques. La valeur de +3.7 epsilon Nd révèle qu à l’instar des autres roehes ignées du terrane de Caledonia, le magma qui a formé le pluton du mont Caledonia ne provenait pas directement du manieau épuisé mais qu'une partie de l'écorce plus àgrée a été mélée à sa pétrogenèse. soit directement dans le seeteur d'origine ou par interaction subséquente avec le matériel crustal. Les valeurs élevées de Ti, de Fe, de V et de P dans le gabbro permettent de supposer qu'il pourrait exisler un potentiel de gites rentables. soit dans le plulon du mont Caledonia, soit dans des massifs analogues a l'intérieur des collinescalédoniennes. Traduit par la rédaction

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.411
Threshold uncertainty score0.817

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtlantic GeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207