Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT This article explores the impact of globalization and neo-liberal reforms on the health of Venezuelans and Cubans during the 1980s and 1990s. It seeks to illustrate, through the lens of health care, how global economic forces affect national development and people's lives. Venezuela and Cuba struggled with severe economic crises and their health systems suffered. Cuba, however, was able to preserve a greater degree of control over its adjustment to the global economy and thus maintained a relatively good health system. Venezuela, on the other hand, embraced neo-liberal policies prescribed by the IMF and other international financial institutions, lost autonomy, and failed to protect its health care system adequately. RÉSUMÉ Ce texte porte sur les répercussions de la mondialisation et des réformes néolibérales sur la santé des Venezueliens et des Cubains pendant les années 1980 et 1990. Par l'entremise des soins de santé, l'article cherche à démontrer comment les forces économiques globales touchent le progrès national d'un pays et la vie de ses citoyens. Le Venezuela et Cuba ont éprouvé des crises économiques sévères et les systèmes de santé des deux pays ont dû faire face à des difficultés considérables. Toutefois, Cuba s'est mieux adapté à l'économie globale que le Venezuela, et le système de santé cubain est plus ou moins bon. Pour sa part, le Venezuela a adopté des politiques néo-libérales telles qu'avancées par FMI et autres institutions financières internationales. Par conséquent, le Vénézuéla a perdu son autonomie et le pays n'a pas réussi à protéger son système de santé.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it