Intramolecular Hydrogen Bond-Controlled Prolyl Amide Isomerization in Glucosyl 3(<i>S</i>)-Hydroxy-5-hydroxymethylproline Hybrids: A Computational Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peptide mimics containing spirocyclic glucosyl-(3(S)-hydroxy-5(S)-hydroxymethyl)proline (1) and glucosyl-(3(S)-hydroxy-5(R)-hydroxymethyl)proline (2) hybrids differing in the stereochemistry of the polar hydroxymethyl substitutent at the C-5- or (C(delta))-position have been investigated computationally. A computational "build and search" protocol of molecular mechanics systematic search/Monte Carlo search, followed by density functional theory (DFT), has been developed to ensure complete coverage of the large conformational space. Gas-phase DFT optimizations at the B3LYP level of theory lead to a strong preference for the cis conformation in the prolyl amide bond for both compounds 1 and 2. However, inclusion of the solvent water by means of continuum solvation (PCM) results in a reduction of the prolyl amide cis population in both compounds, leading to good agreement with previous experimental observations. Intramolecular hydrogen bonding involving the C-5-hydroxymethyl substitutent is seen to play a crucial role to tune the thermodynamics of prolyl amide cis/trans isomerization and is responsible for the high cis prolyl amide population in compound 2. Our results indicate that H-bond-forming substituents like the hydroxymethyl group at the C-5-position in proline can be used to control cis/trans prolyl amide isomerization. High cis prolyl amide conformer populations can be achieved by proper choice of the stereochemistry at the C-5-position.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".