MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2080966006 · doi:10.1109/tia.2013.2256411

Effect of Pulsewidth on Medium Temperature Rise and Microbial Inactivation Under Pulsed Electric Field Food Treatment

2013· article· en· W2080966006 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrobial Inactivation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectric fieldPulse (music)Pulse generatorMaterials scienceVoltagePulse-width modulationGenerator (circuit theory)Context (archaeology)OptoelectronicsRise timeElectrical engineeringPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the context of developing pulsed electric field (PEF) food treatment as a potential nonthermal method in producing high-quality food products, knowledge of pulse parameters on temperature rise is important. In this research, a newly developed high-voltage square pulse generator is implemented to study the effect of pulsewidth and pulse frequency on temperature rise, keeping both the applied electric field and energy constant. Real-time temperature changes in the treatment zone during PEF treatment are measured using an infrared camera. In addition, bacterial inactivation tests are carried out to validate the functionality of the pulse generator, under the same PEF treatment conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.811

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it