Bibliographic record
Abstract
Somewhat belatedly may I wish all of our readers a Happy New Year and a successful 2005! The IWJ has made significant progress in its first year and this for the most part due to you our readers, our 6 Strategic Partners and our Editorial Executives and Advisory Board. The IWJ has established itself as the only, really International Journal specifically focused on wounds and their treatment. Through our Strategic Partners we reached far and wide, targeting the significant wound care meetings, including the WUWHS, SAWC, Wounds UK to name a few. One role of our Strategic Partners is to help us obtain global coverage. If you have obtained this copy of the IWJ at a conference or from a colleague and wish further copies ask one of our Strategic Partner companies how this may be possible. Most of their staff should be familiar with the IWJ. If your company contact is not familiar with the IWJ, introduce it to them, and thank them for their company's efforts to help establish this important International educational and informational resource. So now it's onward and upward and on to 2005 and our second volume. You have heard from our Editor-in-Chief about some exciting developments for 2005. Please allow me the opportunity to further explain their significance to the IWJ. We have increased our page count, in a bid to publish additional contributions. We therefore encourage you the reader to submit your research findings through submissions@ internationalwoundjournal.com. The additional production costs have been covered by our Strategic Partners preventing us from having to increase our subscription rate or to include additional advertising. Therefore all of our additional pages are available to increase the publication of new papers in this area. Our language offerings are being increased to include additional languages throughout the year, beginning with Swedish in this edition. Swedish is a language understood by most Scandinavian countries thereby increasing our exposure to an International readership. If you feel a particular language is important for us to increase our reach then why not write to us. We will be happy to consider your request but cannot promise to include all languages suggested. In 2005 we want to hear more from our readers. Tell us what you think of our Journal. Share your thoughts, we are happy to hear from you and in particular how we can improve things. The sustainability of the IWJ requires your participation. We can only expand with the clinical and research input from our readers. So if you like what you see and long to have International exposure for your work then send it to us! Our Strategic Partners and other advertisers have made the commitment now it's your turn. The Editor-in-Chief and I are proud of what we have achieved in 2004. We did not do this alone, but with the help of many significant individuals for whom we give thanks. We do however know that we can do better and in 2005 we intend to! Prof. Zulifiqarali Abbas, Tanzania Prof. Bishara Atiyeh, Lebanon Dr Adrian Barbul, USA Suzie Calne, UK Dr Robertto Cassino, Italy Dr Celalettin Çelebi, Turkey Dr George Cherry, UK Dr Mike Clark, UK Dr Diane Cooper, USA Dr Ian Darby, Australia Dr Jeff Davidson, USA Dr Sebastian Debus, Germany Dr William Ennis, USA Dr Vincent Falanga, USA Dr Mieke Flour, Belgium Evonne Fowler, USA Prof. Peter Franks, UK Prof. Xiabong Fu, China Prof. Finn Gottrup, Denmark David Gray, UK Dr Satsue Hagisawa, Japan Dr Eva-Lisa Heinrichs, UK Dr Dirk Hollander, Germany Dr Pamela Houghton, Canada Prof. Kent Jönsson, Zimbabwe Dr David Keast, Canada Dr Kazuo Kishi, Japan Dr Diane Krasner, USA Dr Stephan Landis, Arab Emirates Prof. David Leaper, UK Dr Luis Fernando Lira, Mexico Dr Courtney Lyder, USA Dr Mario Marazzi, Italy Dr Sylvie Meaume, France Dr Joe McCulloch, USA Yvette Moulin, Canada Dr Manoj Pandey, India Nancy Parslow, Canada Prof. Hugo Partsch, Austria Prof. Hermelinda Pedrosa, Brazil Dr Elaine Pina, Portugal Dr Elia Ricci, Italy Dr Ricardo Roa, Chile Dr George Rodeheaver, USA Dr Jose Contreras Ruiz, Mexico Prof. Vijay Shukla, India Dr Mark Tang, Singapore Cath Vowden, UK Dr Peter Vowden, UK
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.029 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.014 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.217 | 0.198 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".