Effects of enalapril, candesartan or both on neurohumoral activation and LV volumes and function in patients with heart failure not treated with a beta-blocker
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The long-term effects of the angiotensin-receptor blocker candesartan, the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril or their combination have been incompletely studied in a large cohort of patients with heart failure not treated with beta-blockers. The objective of this study was to investigate the changes in neurohormones and LV volumes and ejection fraction in patients treated with enalapril, candesartan, or enalapril plus candesartan without concomitant beta-blocker therapy. METHODS: Three hundred and ninety-two patients from the RESOLVD pilot study not treated with a beta-blocker at baseline or at any time during the trial were analyzed. Norepinephrine, endothelin-1, big endothelin-1, angiotensin-II, aldosterone, N-terminal proANP, BNP, and radionuclide angiography were measured before and after 43 weeks of treatment with candesartan alone (n = 162), or enalapril alone (n = 45), or candesartan plus enalapril (n = 185). Endpoints were assessed at baseline and after 43 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes increased significantly at 43 weeks in all groups except for patients treated with enalapril plus candesartan. BNP decreased at 43 weeks only in patients receiving dual angiotensin-II suppression (-6.1 +/- 37.8 pmol/l). Angiotensin-II levels were significantly increased in patients treated with candesartan (+23.6 +/- 47.1 pg/ml; p<0.05). CONCLUSION: We conclude that angiotensin-II modulation, with enalapril and candesartan, without concomitant utilization of beta-blocker lead to a decrease in BNP and an attenuation of the increase in LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes without a reversal of this process in the long term.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".