MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081051528 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2014.6901092

PAPR reduction in OFDM systems using differentially encoded subcarriers

2014· article· en· W2081051528 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubcarrierOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingReduction (mathematics)AlgorithmTransmitterComputer scienceBit error rateCumulative distribution functionMonte Carlo methodEncoding (memory)Electronic engineeringMathematicsDecoding methodsProbability density functionTelecommunicationsStatisticsChannel (broadcasting)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) reduction technique that exploits the principle of differential encoding of subcarriers is proposed and investigated. The absolute maximum sample of the time-domain OFDM symbol is chosen as the reference to carry out the differential encoding process at the transmitter. A real multiplier (??) is applied to this reference to achieve appropriate PAPR level. Information about the proposed reference, however, is required to be communicated to the receiver, which performs the reverse effect to obtain back the original sequence of samples. The effectiveness of the proposed technique is evaluated through extensive computer simulations and complementary cumulative distribution function (CCDF) are obtained as a function of number of subcarriers and modulations. Numerical results confirm that significant reduction in PAPR can be achieved. For example, the proposed technique reduces the 0.1 percent PAPR to 1.5 dB for a 1024 subcarrier OFDM system, resulting in 10.3 dB reduction. Moreover, error performances of the OFDM system before and after applying the proposed technique are investigated using Monte Carlo simulations. Numerical results show that the average bit error rate performance of the proposed system does not degrade relative to the un-encoded system. An investigation of the complexity of the proposed technique with other techniques show that it is quite low complex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.390
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207