MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081133538 · doi:10.1029/2001wr000234

Reactive transport modeling of an in situ reactive barrier for the treatment of hexavalent chromium and trichloroethylene in groundwater

2001· article· en· W2081133538 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Resources Research · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of CanadaPacific Northwest National LaboratoryU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
KeywordsPermeable reactive barrierHexavalent chromiumEnvironmental remediationGroundwaterAquiferZerovalent ironSulfateChemistryEnvironmental chemistryChromiumContaminationGeologyAdsorptionGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multicomponent reactive transport modeling was conducted for the permeable reactive barrier at the Coast Guard Support Center near Elizabeth City, North Carolina. The zero‐valent iron barrier was installed to treat groundwater contaminated by hexavalent chromium and chlorinated solvents. The simulations were performed using the reactive transport model MIN3P, applied to an existing site‐specific conceptual model. Reaction processes controlling the geochemical evolution within and down gradient of the barrier were considered. Within the barrier, the treatment of the contaminants, the reduction of other electron acceptors present in the ambient groundwater, microbially mediated sulfate reduction, the precipitation of secondary minerals, and degassing of hydrogen gas were included. Down gradient of the barrier, water‐rock interactions between the highly alkaline and reducing pore water emanating from the barrier and the aquifer material were considered. The model results illustrate removal of Cr(VI) and the chlorinated solvents by the reactive barrier and highlight that reactions other than the remediation reactions most significantly affect the water chemistry in the barrier. In particular, sulfate reduction and iron corrosion by water control the evolution of the pore water while passing through the treatment system. The simulation results indicate that secondary mineral formation has the potential to decrease the porosity in the barrier over the long term and illustrate that the precipitation of minerals is concentrated in the upgradient portion of the barrier. Two‐dimensional simulations demonstrate how preferential flow can affect the reduction of electron acceptors, the consumption of the treatment material, and the formation of secondary minerals. In addition, the model results indicate that deprotonation and the adsorption of cations down gradient of the barrier can potentially explain the observed pH buffering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it