The Conformation of the T-antigen Disaccharide Bound toMaclura pomifera Agglutinin in Aqueous Solution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The complex of Maclura pomifera agglutinin with the T-antigen disaccharide (beta-d-Gal-(1-->3)-alpha-d-GalNAc-(1-->O)-Me) was investigated by NMR spectroscopy in aqueous solution. Intramolecular transferred nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) effects between the monosaccharide moieties were used to derive the ligand conformation in the lectin-bound state. Ligand protons in contact with the protein were identified by saturation transfer difference experiments and intermolecular transferred NOE effects. It is demonstrated that structural differences exist for the ligand-lectin complex in aqueous solution as compared with the previously published crystal structure (Lee, X., Thompson, A., Zhiming, Z., Ton-that, H., Biesterfeldt, J., Ogata, C., Xu, L., Johnston, R. A. Z. , and Young, N. M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 6312-6318). In order to accommodate the O-methyl group of the disaccharide, the amino acid side chain of Tyr-122 has to rotate from its position in the crystal. The NMR data are in accord with two conformational families at the beta-(1-->3)glycosidic linkage in the solution complex with interglycosidic angles phi/psi = 45/-65 degrees and -65/-18 degrees. These differ from the bound conformation of the ligand in the crystal (phi/psi = 39/-8 degrees ) and are not highly populated by the ligand in the free state. The reason for the structural differences at the beta-(1-->3)glycosidic linkage are hydrogen bonds that stabilize the relative orientation of the monosaccharide units in the crystal. Our results demonstrate that the crystallization of a protein-carbohydrate complex can interfere with the delicate process of carbohydrate recognition in solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".