MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081151952 · doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7341.835

Unhappy doctors: what are the causes and what can be done?

2002· letter· en· W2081151952 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ · 2002
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare cost, quality, practices
Canadian institutionsConfederation College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsmCherryGene isoformFluorescent proteinGreen fluorescent proteinProtein expressionFluorescenceBiologyComputational biologyTranslation (biology)Protein isoformCell biologyBioinformaticsGeneticsMessenger RNAGenePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Abstract</h3> Fluorescent proteins are essential reporters in cell biology and molecular biology. Here, we reveal that red-fluorescent proteins possess an alternative translation initiation site that produces a short functional protein isoform. The short isoform creates significant background fluorescence that biases the outcome of expression studies. Our investigation identifies the short protein isoform, traces its origin, and determines the extent of the issue within the family of red fluorescent protein. Our analysis shows that the short isoform defect of the red fluorescent protein family may affect the interpretation of many published studies. Finally, we provide a re-engineered mCherry variant that lacks background expression as an improved tool for imaging and protein expression studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.625
GPT teacher head0.542
Teacher spread0.082 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it