MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081164013 · doi:10.1093/protein/gzu025

Toward a high-throughput screening platform for directed evolution of enzymes that activate genotoxic prodrugs

2014· article· en· W2081164013 on OpenAlexaff
Janine N. Copp, Elizabeth Williams, Michelle H. Rich, Adam V. Patterson, Jeff B. Smaill, David F. Ackerley

Bibliographic record

VenueProtein Engineering Design and Selection · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProdrugNitroreductaseDirected evolutionCell sortingChemistryGeneEscherichia coliHigh-throughput screeningEnzymeComputational biologyReporter geneProtein engineeringDNABiochemistryBiologyMolecular biologyCellGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Engineering of enzymes to more efficiently activate genotoxic prodrugs holds great potential for improving anticancer gene or antibody therapies. We report the development of a new, GFP-based, high-throughput screening platform to enable engineering of prodrug-activating enzymes by directed evolution. By fusing an inducible SOS promoter to an engineered GFP reporter gene, we were able to measure levels of DNA damage in intact Escherichia coli and separate cell populations by fluorescence activating cell sorting (FACS). In two FACS iterations, we were able to achieve a 90,000-fold enrichment of a functional prodrug-activating nitroreductase from a null library background.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProtein Engineering Design and SelectionSame topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207