MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081177915 · doi:10.1121/1.4781627

Numerical and experimental investigations of transformations of near-field to far-field scattering measurements

2006· article· en· W2081177915 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNear and far fieldScatteringInversion (geology)Field (mathematics)Computational physicsFunction (biology)AcousticsPhysicsOpticsMathematicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the size of a target and measurement constraints, the measurements of monostatic acoustic scattering are often made in the near field of the target. For many applications, it is an estimate of the far-field target scattering strength, which is desired. In this presentation some model-based inversion techniques, which can be used to predict far-field monostatic target strengths as a function of aspect angle, are derived. In particular, a set of near-field measurements is used in an inversion scheme to compute coefficients for either a linear array of point scatterers or for a generalized Kirchhoff model of the target. The resulting model is then used to predict the far field scattering amplitudes. Simulated and experimental data are used to illustrate the accuracy of the proposed methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.546
Threshold uncertainty score0.201

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it