A Surprising Twist: An Unusual Failure of a Keyed Filling Device Specific for a Volatile Inhaled Anesthetic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Brief We describe two cases in which keyed filling devices for sevoflurane were inadvertently screwed onto isoflurane bottles. The mishaps were possible because the collars on sevoflurane and isoflurane bottles are mirror images of each other. The particular keyed filling device was designed with a flexible outer sleeve and could be screwed onto the wrong bottle while slightly gouging its soft plastic collar. The keyed filling adapters for sevoflurane and isoflurane could each be manipulated to fit the other's bottle. A manufacturer (Southmedic, Inc., Barrie, Canada) has modified their keyed filling adapters to prevent this unusual circumstance from recurring. IMPLICATIONS: We describe two cases in which keyed filling devices specific for sevoflurane bottles were inadvertently screwed onto isoflurane bottles. The mishaps occurred because of a combination of active error (a slip or lapse) and latent errors (user inexperience and an unusual equipment failure of the keyed filling device).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".