Interactions of the 18.5-kDa isoform of myelin basic protein with Ca<sup>2+</sup>-calmodulin: in vitro studies using fluorescence microscopy and spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The interactions of the 18.5-kDa isoform of myelin basic protein (MBP) with calmodulin (CaM) in vitro have been investigated using fluorescence microscopy and spectroscopy. Two forms of MBP were used: the natural bovine C1 charge isomer (bMBP/C1) and a hexahistidine-tagged recombinant murine product (rmMBP), with only minor differences in behaviour being observed. Fragments of each protein generated by digestion with cathepsin D (EC 3.4.23.5) were also evaluated. Using fluorescence microscopy, it was shown that MBP and CaM interacted in the presence of Ca2+ under a variety of conditions, including high urea and salt concentrations, indicating that the interaction was specific and not merely electrostatic in nature. Using cathepsin D digestion fragments of MBP, it was further shown that the carboxyl-terminal domain of MBP interacted with Ca(2+)-CaM, consistent with our theoretical prediction. Spectroscopy of the intrinsic fluorescence of the sole Trp residue of MBP showed that binding was cooperative in nature. The dissociation constants for formation of a 1:1 MBP-Ca(2+)-CaM complex were determined to be 2.1 +/- 0.1 and 2.0 +/- 0.2 microM for bMBP/C1 and rmMBP, respectively. Fluorescence spectroscopy using cathepsin D digestion fragments indicated also that the carboxyl-terminal region of each protein interacted with Ca(2+)-CaM, with dissociation constants of 1.8 +/- 0.2 and 2.8 +/- 0.9 microM for the bMBP/C1 and rmMBP fragments, respectively. These values show a roughly 1000-fold lower affinity of MBP for CaM than other CaM-binding peptides, such as myristoylated alanine-rich C-kinase substrate, that are involved in signal transduction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".