MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081220686 · doi:10.1353/smr.2011.0020

Everybody Talks about the Weather ... We Don't: The Writings of Ulrike Meinhof (review)

2011· article· en· W2081220686 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminar A Journal of Germanic Studies · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunism, Protests, Social Movements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtTheologyHistoryPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Everybody Talks about the Weather ... We Don't: The Writings of Ulrike Meinhof Christina Gerhardt Karin Bauer , ed. Everybody Talks about the Weather... We Don't: The Writings of Ulrike Meinhof. New York: Seven Stories Press, 2008. 268 pp. US$ 16.95 (paper). ISBN 978-1-58322-831-9. Everybody Talks about the Weather ... — edited and introduced by Karin Bauer, with a short preface by Nobel Prize winner Elfriede Jelinek and an afterword by Meinhof's daughter Bettina Röhl — presents twenty-four articles by Ulrike Meinhof translated into English by Luise von Flotow. Written and published in the Hamburg-based magazine konkret between 1959 and 1968, two years before Meinhof joined the RAF and went underground, the articles are drawn from archival materials as well as from three volumes of Meinhof's writings available in German. Bauer's introduction details Meinhof's life growing up and her early participation in protests against the rearmament of West Germany. She outlines Meinhof's personal life: her marriage to Klaus Rainer Röhl, their move to a villa in Hamburg, and the birth of their twin daughters. Bauer also chronicles Meinhof's meteoric professional rise. In 1959 Meinhof began writing for konkret, which Röhl had founded in 1955 under another name. She was editor-in-chief from 1961 to 1964, returned to writing for it as a freelancer in 1964, and ultimately resigned in 1968. Bauer moves to Meinhof's time as a member of the RAF from its founding in 1970 to her death on 4 May 1976 in Stammheim maximum-security prison. She discusses as well how Meinhof has lived on, as a projection surface, a historical figure, a pop icon, an image frequently reproduced in art, and a figure in dramas. She introduces the reader not only to Meinhof but also to post-World War II West German history and politics. Meinhof's articles address most of the era's pivotal events. A few of them look back at Germany's fascist era and its legacy, others discuss the new West German constitution, the Vietnam War, the Six-Day War of 1967, feminist politics, the West German SDS (Sozialistische Deutscher Studentenbund), student actions, increased police brutality at demonstrations, and the 1968 department-store fire set by Andreas Baader and Gudrun Ensslin two years before they cofounded the Red Army Faction along with others. The selection leans heavily towards articles looking back at the fascist era and those written in 1968. To some extent, this selection suggests that the student movement was working through Germany's fascist past, which, to be sure, it was doing. Other political concerns, however, abounded; the selection could have given a broader picture of the political landscape during the 1960s given the range of issues Meinhof covers in her writings. Since the Easter Marches, which Meinhof participated in and wrote about, formed a pivotal expression of widespread West German agitation against West German re-armament, against joining NATO, and against nuclear weapons and energy, it would have been worthwhile to include the essay "Easter Marches" (1964). Likewise, the Cold War shaped 1960s German politics, influencing a range of decisions, from whether or not to have a military to which political parties should be allowed to exist. While the opening [End Page 391] article "Shadows of the Summit Pointing West" (1960) presents the Cold War's origins, it would have been helpful to include "Status Quo Mauer" (1962), which elaborates on Cold War developments. Furthermore, the emergency laws, which permitted temporarily reducing constitutional rights during a state of emergency, were a source of contention. Drafts of the laws were written as early as 1958; however, it was only through the 1966 Grand Coalition between the CDU (Christian Democratic Union) and the SPD (Social Democratic Party) that they could eventually be passed in 1968. Meinhof wrote numerous articles about them over the years. For these reasons, it would have been valuable to include at least one them, for example "Gegen wen? Wider ein deutsches Notstandsgesetz," "Notstandgesetz 1. Lesung," or "Große Koalition." Equally important throughout the 1960s was the increasing failure of representational politics for leftists. Domestically, four concerns form an important backdrop to...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.537
Threshold uncertainty score0.722

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it