Avalanche multiplication phenomenon in amorphous semiconductors: Amorphous selenium versus hydrogenated amorphous silicon
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although the effect of the impact ionization and the consequent avalanche multiplication in amorphous selenium (a-Se) was established long ago and has led to the development and commercialization of ultrasensitive video tubes, the underlying physics of these phenomena in amorphous semiconductors has not yet been fully understood. In particular, it is puzzling why this effect has been evidenced at practical electric fields only in a-Se among all amorphous materials. For instance, impact ionization seems much more feasible in hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) since the charge carrier mobility in a-Si:H is much higher than that in a-Se and also the amount of energy needed for ionization of secondary carriers in a-Si:H is lower than that in a-Se. Using the description of the avalanche effect based on the lucky-drift model recently developed for amorphous semiconductors we show how this intriguing question can be answered. It is the higher phonon energy in a-Si:H than that in a-Se, which is responsible for the shift of the avalanche threshold in a-Si:H to essentially higher fields as compared to a-Se.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it