Avalanche multiplication phenomenon in amorphous semiconductors: Amorphous selenium versus hydrogenated amorphous silicon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although the effect of the impact ionization and the consequent avalanche multiplication in amorphous selenium (a-Se) was established long ago and has led to the development and commercialization of ultrasensitive video tubes, the underlying physics of these phenomena in amorphous semiconductors has not yet been fully understood. In particular, it is puzzling why this effect has been evidenced at practical electric fields only in a-Se among all amorphous materials. For instance, impact ionization seems much more feasible in hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) since the charge carrier mobility in a-Si:H is much higher than that in a-Se and also the amount of energy needed for ionization of secondary carriers in a-Si:H is lower than that in a-Se. Using the description of the avalanche effect based on the lucky-drift model recently developed for amorphous semiconductors we show how this intriguing question can be answered. It is the higher phonon energy in a-Si:H than that in a-Se, which is responsible for the shift of the avalanche threshold in a-Si:H to essentially higher fields as compared to a-Se.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".