MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Experimental Investigation on Mechanical Properties of Sandstone in Three Gorges Reservoir Area under Unloading Condition

2014· article· en· W2081231418 on OpenAlexaff
Xing Xia Wang, Jian Wen Huang, Zai Yi Liao

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced materials research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeoscience and Mining Technology
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersChina Three Gorges UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCohesion (chemistry)Geotechnical engineeringBrittlenessDeformation (meteorology)Overburden pressureThree gorgesGeologyMaterials scienceStress (linguistics)ModulusStage (stratigraphy)Composite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Test results show that unloading failure is more brittle than loading failure, and rock samples suffer more damage under unloading failure, especially in high stress. Unloading failure leads to deterioration of deformation modulus, internal friction angle, and cohesion, whose values changes with the changing of stress state. Unloading stress-strain curves of sandstone samples could be divided into four stages, loading stage, unloading stage, brittle stress drop stage, ideal plastic stage, and well fitted by polynomials. There is springback deformation in the second stage, which decreases with increase of initial confining pressure. These test results could offer theory support for analysis of deformation and stability of actual projects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced materials researchSame topicGeoscience and Mining TechnologyFrench-language works237,207