Role of Aromatic Residues at the Lipid−Water Interface in Micelle-Bound Bacteriophage M13 Major Coat Protein
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analyses of transmembrane domains of proteins have revealed that aromatic residues tend to cluster at or near the lipid-water interface of the membrane. To assess protein-membrane interactions of such residues, a viable mutant library was generated of the major coat protein of bacteriophage M13 (a model single membrane-spanning protein) in which one or the other of its interfacial tyrosine residues (Tyr-21 and Tyr-24) is mutated. Using the interfacial tryptophan (Trp-26) as an intrinsic probe, blue shifts in fluorescence emission spectra and quenching constants indicated that mutants with a polar amino acid substitution (such as Y24D or Y24N) are less buried in a deoxycholate micelle environment than in the wild type protein. These polar mutants also exhibited alpha-helix to beta-structure transition temperatures in incremental-heating circular dichroism studies relatively lower than those of wild type and nonpolar mutants (such as Y21V, Y21I, and Y24A), indicating that specific side chains in the lipid-water interface influence local protein-micelle interactions. Mutant Y21F exhibited the highest transition temperature, suggesting that phenylalanine is ostensibly the most effective interfacial anchoring residue. Using phage viability as the assay in a combination of site-directed and saturation mutagenesis experiments, it was further observed that both Tyr residues could not simultaneously be "knocked out". The overall results support the notion that an interfacial Tyr is a primary recognition element for precise strand positioning in vivo, a function that apparently cannot be performed optimally by residues with simple aliphatic character.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".