MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081344000 · doi:10.1049/iet-spr.2011.0328

Gaussian mixture model approximation of total spatial power spectral density for multiple incoherently distributed sources

2013· article· en· W2081344000 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Signal Processing · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGaussianSpectral densityCovarianceMixture modelAlgorithmGaussian processMixture distributionProbability density functionMathematicsComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)StatisticsArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Practically, the spatial power spectral density (PSD) of single or multiple incoherently distributed (ID) sources is often unknown, and the total spatial PSD is suitable to model the spatial distribution characteristic of signals if the number of multiple ID sources is also unknown. In this study, the Gaussian mixture model (GMM) is employed to characterise the total spatial PSD of multiple ID sources, and two algorithms are proposed to estimate the parameters of the GMM. The first one is the covariance fitting method for multiple ID sources with Gaussian PSD, and the other is the iterative expectation maximisation (EM) algorithm. Simulation studies demonstrate that the EM algorithm outperforms other methods in approximating the shape of the total spatial PSD, especially for small spatial spread.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.647
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it