The Combustion Characteristics of n-Heptane Fueled HCCI Engine Operation With Gaseous Fuels Admission
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of the introduction of the gaseous fuels, methane, hydrogen and carbon monoxide into the intake of a variable compression ratio n-heptane fuelled HCCI, CFR engine were investigated. The variations in some of the key combustion and operational parameters were determined experimentally. These included cylinder pressure and its rise rate temporal developments, autoignition timing, combustion durations for both the low and high temperature reaction regions, COV values for IMEP and maximum cylinder pressure, and the incidence of knock and its intensity. In parallel with the experimental investigation, results of a numerical simulation of the processes involved obtained by employing a KIVA based approach while incorporating sufficiently detailed chemical kinetics are presented. It was found that supplementing n-heptane HCCI with gaseous fuels could inhibit the low temperature combustion region and delay to varying extents the high temperature combustion region. Methane admission produced lengthening of the delay to autoignition and extended the combustion durations. It is suggested that supplementing the liquid fuel with methane may be a means for controlling the combustion process of a liquid fuelled HCCI engine while obtaining higher power and acceptable levels of emissions without producing unacceptably heavy knock. However, the addition of hydrogen or carbon monoxide could not reduce the intensity of knock while improving power output.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".