MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081366482 · doi:10.1002/dama.201090074

Design of Unreinforced Masonry According to the Canadian Standards

2010· article· de· W2081366482 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yasser Korany

Bibliographic record

VenueMauerwerk · 2010
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMasonryUnreinforced masonry buildingStructural engineeringEngineeringHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Canadian standard CSA S304.1‐04 provides provisions for the structural design of unreinforced, reinforced, prestressed, and prefabricated masonry structures and for ‐ masonry components such as beams, walls, columns, and pilasters in accordance with the requirements of the National Building Code of Canada. The Canadian standard prescribes the limit states design method for all types of masonry construction. An empirical design approach is permitted for unreinforced masonry. In this article, an overview of the provisions of CSA S304.1‐04 pertaining to the design of unreinforced masonry structures is presented. Bemessung von unbewehrtem Mauerwerk nach der Kanadischen Norm. Die kanadische Norm CSA S304.1‐04 enthält Festlegungen zur ingenieurmäßigen Bemessung von unbewehrten, bewehrten, vorgespannten und vorgefertigten Mauerwerkkonstruktionen und für Mauerwerksbauteile wie Balken, Wände, Pfeiler und Pilaster in Übereinstimmung mit der kanadischen Bauordnung. Die nationalen Bauvorschriften fordern die Anwendung der Methode der Grenzzustände für alle Arten von Mauerwerkkonstruktionen. Eine empirische Bemessungsmethode ist für unbewehrtes Mauerwerk zugelassen. In dem vorliegenden Beitrag wird ein Überblick über die Kanadische Bemessungsnorm im Hinblick auf die Bemessung von unbewehrtem Mauerwerk gegeben. Der Beitrag stellt die meisten, jedoch nicht alle Festlegungen zur ingenieurmäßigen Bemessung von unbewehrtem Mauerwerk vor. Interessierte Leser können in den angegebenen Quellen weitere Informationen und Ausführungen dazu finden. Der Leser sei aber auch darauf hingewiesen, dass die kanadische Norm weitere Festlegungen zur ingenieurmäßigen Bemessung von bewehrtem, vorgespanntem und vorgefertigtem Mauerwerk enthält. Die diese Art von Mauerwerk betreffenden Passagen werden hier nicht vorgestellt.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score0.917

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMauerwerkSame topicStructural Behavior of Reinforced ConcreteFrench-language works237,207