MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081378204 · doi:10.1093/ehr/cen403

Somoza and Roosevelt: Good Neighbour diplomacy in Nicaragua, 1933-1945

2009· article· en· W2081378204 on OpenAlexaff
Tom Buchanan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe English Historical Review · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Relations in Latin America
Canadian institutionsKellogg's (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBLISSPower (physics)PresidencyHegemonySpanish Civil WarDictatorshipHonourDiplomacyState (computer science)Interpretation (philosophy)ArtilleryLawPolitical scienceSociologyHistoryPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This detailed study of diplomatic relations between the United States and Nicaragua has one foot firmly planted in the heated polemics of the 1980s, when the recently-overthrown Somoza dictatorship was frequently portrayed as having been a creation of US policy. Andrew Crawley correctly points out that these highly politicised debates were rarely conducted with much regard for the documentary evidence, and poses the important question of ‘what demands can reasonably be made on the history of the good neighbour policy in Nicaragua’ (p. 6). His main achievement is to present a new and more sympathetic interpretation of the role played by Arthur Bliss Lane, the chief of the US mission in Managua between 1933 and 1936. Lane has often been depicted as the man responsible for both the death of the revolutionary leader Augusto Sandino and the rise to power of Anastasio Somoza García, director of the US-sponsored Guardia Nacional. Instead, Crawley presents Lane as a man of honour, who was mortified by the murder of Sandino in 1934 and—against his own instincts—sought to protect the elected presidency of Sacasa against Somoza's insidious manoeuvres. Lane appears, therefore, to have waged a lone struggle to avert the danger of civil war between the opposing factions with no support from the State Department. Crawley's defence of Lane is convincing, but his handling of the broader US influence over Nicaragua, which can only be described as hegemonic, is more awkward. Indeed, much of the book consists of a meditation on the impossibility of US non-interference under the auspices of the ‘Good Neighbour’ policy (which Roosevelt had announced in his 1933 inaugural address). This results in some rather tortuous interpretations of US involvement with the Somoza dictatorship. For instance, we are told that the Roosevelt administration ‘cannot be held ultimately and solely “accountable” for [Somoza’s] presidency and subsequent excesses…however, some measure of responsibility is incontestable’ (p. 60). Elsewhere, it is argued that ‘the sort of government that [Somoza] seemed likely to provide came briefly to represent for American diplomats and strategists the option most likely to serve Washington's interests in changing circumstances’ (p. 120).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score0.748

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe English Historical ReviewSame topicInternational Relations in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207