Origin of vertical shafts in bedrock along the Eramosa River valley near Guelph, southern Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Numerous vertical to subvertical, cylindrical shafts occur in the rugged exposures of the Middle Silurian Amabel Formation bedrock along the Eramosa River, approximately 10 km northeast of Guelph. These shafts vary from < 1 m to 10 m in diameter, with depths as great as 12 m. They can occur as isolated depressions but more commonly are clustered closely together, and many coalesce to form sinuous bedrock walls. These depressions may contain soil, fine sediment, rubble from the surrounding dolomite bedrock, and rounded clasts of Precambrian basement lithologies. Till is conspicuously absent. These shafts occur in close proximity to cavernous pores that were formed during pre-Wisconsinan to Early Wisconsinan time, suggesting a possible karstic origin. The cylindrical shafts, however, with their greater midpoint diameters, sculpted interiors, and inclined axes, and their lack of vertical flutes and till, are more likely to have originated from glaciofluvial discharge at the end of the Late Wisconsinan. The development of these shafts may have been assisted by cavitation, which enhanced the erosional capacity of sediment-laden meltwaters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".