Pyrolysis of Waste Fryer Grease in a Fixed-Bed Reactor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Waste fryer grease (WFG) is an environmentally preferable option for hydrogen production. In the present work, the pyrolysis of waste fryer grease in the absence of catalyst was studied in a fixed-bed reactor. The effects of various operating parameters such as reaction temperature (650−850 °C), carrier gas (N 2 ) flow rate (30−70 mL/min), and reactor inert packing particle size (0.5−2.5 mm) on hydrogen and syngas (i.e., mixture of H 2 + CO) production were studied. Quadratic response surface models used in analyzing the product gas and char data showed that temperature was the most important parameter over the wide range of conditions studied. The effect of particle size on the product gas and char yield was not significant. Residence time influenced both hydrogen and syngas composition, but its effect was smaller than that of temperature. Numerical optimization of the responses gave a composition of 17.8 mol % for hydrogen, 26.6 mol % for syngas, and a char yield of 13.7 g/100 g of waste fryer grease. Steam was introduced in the reaction system to increase the hydrogen production. The addition of steam (a steam to carbon ratio of 1.5) caused a drastic increase in the hydrogen production to a maximum of 56.2 mol % and in syngas to a maximum of 82.4 mol %.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".