Degrees of freedom of MIMO cellular networks with two cells and two users per cell
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper characterizes the spatially-normalized degrees of freedom of a 2-cell, 2-user/cell MIMO cellular networks with M antennas at each user and N antennas at each base-station. We show that the optimal DoF is a piecewise linear function, with either M or N being the bottleneck. Denoting the ratio M/N as γ, we show that the network has redundant dimensions in both M and N when γ ϵ {1/2,1} and that the network has no redundancy when γ ϵ {1/4, 2/3, 3/2}. We also show that not all proper systems are feasible and that the only set of feasible proper systems that lie on the proper-improper boundary are those with γ ϵ {1/4, 2/3, 3/2}. We make comparisons between the DoF achievable using strategies such as time sharing between users or cells and discuss their implications on user scheduling in such networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".