MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081410698 · doi:10.1159/000151374

Avian Eggshell Structure and Osteopontin

2008· article· en· W2081410698 on OpenAlexafffund
Yen‐Wei Chien, Maxwell T. Hincke, Marc D. McKee

Bibliographic record

VenueCells Tissues Organs · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone and Dental Protein Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEggshellCalciteBiomineralizationImmunolabelingOsteopontinUltrastructureMatrix (chemical analysis)Transmission electron microscopyCalcificationCalcium carbonateBiophysicsChemistryCell biologyBiologyAnatomyMineralogyMaterials scienceNanotechnologyPathologyImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The avian eggshell primarily consists of calcium carbonate mineral (calcite) and matrix proteins. Here we review matrix-mineral relationships in the eggshell at the ultrastructural level using scanning and transmission electron microscopy, and describe the distribution of osteopontin (OPN) as determined by colloidal gold immunolabeling for OPN. A rich protein network integrated within the calcitic structure of the eggshell shows variable, region-specific organization that included layered fibrous planar sheets of matrix, thin filamentous threads, thin film-like surface coatings, vesicular structures and isolated proteins residing on cleaved {104} crystallographic faces of the eggshell calcite. Except for the vesicular structures, these matrix structures all immunolabeled strongly for OPN. Given the potent mineralization- inhibiting function of OPN, we discuss how this protein might regulate eggshell growth rate and inhibit calcification at specific compartmental boundaries to provide eggshell form.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCells Tissues OrgansSame topicBone and Dental Protein StudiesFrench-language works237,207