Thermodynamic analysis and phase field modeling of domain structures in bilayer ferroelectric thin films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The domain structure in bilayer ferroelectric films was studied by using an analytical thermodynamic theory and computer simulations utilizing the phase field model. It is demonstrated that in a low applied field, a self-poled state can be produced in a bilayer film with one layer in a polydomain state and the other layer in a single-domain state. The presence of the layer with a polydomain structure results in a higher dielectric constant and lower coercive field as compared to a bilayer in a single-domain state. The increase in the applied field results in the transition to a single-domain state in the whole bilayer. The thermodynamic potentials of the layers and the energies of electrostatic and elastic interactions determine the critical fields which can control the transitions between single-domain and polydomain states as well as polarization switching of bilayers. Different thermodynamic hysteresis loops are obtained depending on the relationship between these critical fields and the amplitude of the applied ac field. The phase field model of the domain structure produces results that confirm main predictions of the analytical theory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".