Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’Affamée (1948) est le deuxième récit que Violette Leduc publie aux éditions Gallimard. Bien qu’il soit dédié à Jacques Guérin, le texte apparaît comme une ode au nom caché de Simone de Beauvoir que l’auteure a aimée comme elle a aimé Jacques Guérin : c’est-à-dire sans retour. Or, L’Affamée ne raconte pas uniquement le renoncement de la narratrice à sa passion pour « Madame », il raconte aussi la passion de la narratrice pour le renoncement, inscrivant le récit non seulement dans la lignée augustinienne de la confession littéraire, mais encore en héritier de la poésie mystique dans la tradition de la théologie négative. Tout en usant de « tact » à l’endroit de la « pudeur » de « Madame », le monologue de L’Affamée devient en soi un moyen de connaissance, le texte donnant accès à une jouissance poétique. Ce sont « les retours de la pudeur », dont l’article analyse le travail auctorial, voire (aucto)biographique (du latin auctor qui signifie « celui qui augmente »).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".