Management of Root Knot Disease in Rice Caused by Meloidogyne graminicola through Nematophagous Fungi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A glass house experiment was conducted for the effectiveness of nematophagous fungi against Meloidogynegraminicola in which Arthrobotrys oligospora and Dactylaria eudermata were used for the management of rootknot disease of rice. Root knot nematodes, Meloidogyne graminicola had proved itself as an important limitingfactor for successful cultivation and productivity of rice. By amending the soil with application of mass cultureof two nematophagous fungi (Arthrobotrys oligospora and Dactylaria eudermata) reduced the number of rootgalls by 86.9% and 81.1%, of females by 94.2% and 91.7%. The mass culture of these fungi increased the plantgrowth: shoot length by 41.9% and 38.8%, root length by 44.6% and 41.8%, fresh weight of shoot by 61.1% and58.7%, and fresh weight of root by 24.3% and 22.5%, respectively over nematode infested soil. The betterperformance of A. oligospora may be attributed to better colonization and establishment of A. oligospora than D.eudermata and may be better tolerance of the fungus to soil fungistasis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".