MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2081440424 · doi:10.1182/blood-2010-11-318048

Leukemic transformation of anaplastic large-cell lymphoma

2011· article· en· W2081440424 on OpenAlexaff
Ayesha Y. Vawda, Jeffrey Davis, Suzanne Vercauteren

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsChildren's & Women's Health Centre of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnaplastic large-cell lymphomaLymphomaTransformation (genetics)MedicineCancer researchInternal medicineBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 9-year-old boy was diagnosed with stage III ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) with no evidence of bone marrow and central nervous system disease.Seven months later he had a normocytic anemia (hemoglobin 79 g/L), severe thrombocytopenia (platelets 15 ϫ 10 9 /L), and leukocytosis (white blood cell count 50.8 ϫ 10 9 /L).The automated differential showed neutrophils 28.5 ϫ 10 9 /L, monocytes 13.2 ϫ 10 9 /L, and "other" cells 4.6 ϫ 10 9 /L.The peripheral blood smear (shown) contained large immature cells with basophilic cytoplasm and prominent cytoplasmic vacuolation.Karyorrhexis, pyknosis, and karyolysis were also seen in the large immature cells.Red blood cell morphology showed numerous echinocytes (also known as burr cells), which were likely a consequence of renal failure (creatinine 162M, urea 12.9mM).Flow cytometric immunophenoptyping on the peripheral blood showed that 55% of the cells expressed CD30, HLA-DR, and partial CD13.The cells expressing bright CD30 also expressed CD25.A diagnosis of leukemic transformation of ALCL was made.Microscopic review of the peripheral smear clarified the "automated differential" that was inaccurately reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→