MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081467724 · doi:10.1115/1.4000505

Shakedown Analysis of Nuclear Components Using Linear and Nonlinear Methods

2010· article· en· W2081467724 on OpenAlexaff
Dan Vlaicu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Temperature Alloys and Creep
Canadian institutionsOntario Power Generation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShakedownUpper and lower boundsFinite element methodNonlinear systemLimit loadMathematicsLimit analysisStructural engineeringLinear elasticityLimit (mathematics)Mathematical analysisPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A cyclically loaded structure made of elastic-plastic material is considered as an elastic shakedown if plastic straining occurs in the first few cycles and the sequent response is wholly elastic. In this paper, the finite element method is used to develop upper and lower bound limits for the elastic shakedown of structures under periodic loading conditions. Linear methods using elastic compensation approach and the residual stress method derived from Melan’s theorem are used to generate the lower bound limit for the shakedown load, while the upper bound is found through a method derived from Koiter’s theorem. Furthermore, the results are compared with cycle-by-cycle method based on nonlinear material properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pressure Vessel TechnologySame topicHigh Temperature Alloys and CreepFrench-language works237,207