MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081474528 · doi:10.1139/v05-041

Electron-rich siloxaneplatinum complexes Synthesis, structures, and reactivity

2005· article· en· W2081474528 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Roman Goikhman, T. Karakuz, Linda J. W. Shimon, Gregory Leitus, David Milstein

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIsrael Science Foundation
KeywordsChemistryReactivity (psychology)SiloxaneOxonium ionElectrophileOxidative additionSilylationPlatinumLewis acids and basesMetallacycleDehydrogenationRing (chemistry)Cationic polymerizationStereochemistryMedicinal chemistryCrystallographyPolymer chemistryX-ray crystallographyOrganic chemistryCatalysisDiffractionIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New platinasiloxanes were synthesized and their reactivity was studied. Oxidative addition of (HSiMe2)2O to Pt(PEt3)3 led to dehydrogenation and quantitative formation of the four-membered platinacyclosiloxane [(PEt3)2Pt((SiMe2)2O)] which was characterized by X-ray diffraction. This complex was stable towards non-polar substrates and aerobic conditions, but reacted readily with electrophiles and Lewis acids. Reaction with MeI resulted in ring opening, while MeOTf gave an oxonium complex, with retention of the platinacycle structure. A complex resulting from BF3 coordination to the ring oxygen atom was also obtained. An unprecedented open-chain diplatinasiloxane containing the Pt–Si–O–Si–O–Si–Pt fragment was formed by oxidative addition of H–SiMe2–O–SiMe2–O–SiMe2–H to Pt(PEt3)3 and it was characterized by X-ray diffraction.Key words: cyclosiloxane, metallacycle, platinum silyl, Lewis base, oxidative addition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207