MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081527153 · doi:10.1063/1.2837502

Anomalous exchange bias behavior in ion-beam bombarded NiCo∕(Ni,Co)O bilayers

2008· article· en· W2081527153 on OpenAlexaff
Ko‐Wei Lin, J.‐Y. Guo, H.-Y. Liu, Hao Ouyang, Yuan-Li Chan, Der‐Hsin Wei, J. van Lierop

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic properties of thin films
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBilayerMaterials scienceExchange biasAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Deposition (geology)Phase (matter)Ion beam-assisted depositionNickelHysteresisOxygenMagnetic hysteresisLayer (electronics)IonIon beamCrystallographyChemistryMagnetizationCondensed matter physicsMetallurgyMagnetic anisotropyMembraneNanotechnologyMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The structural and magnetic properties of NiCo∕(Ni,Co)O bilayers were investigated. X-ray diffractometry results have shown that the top NiCo layer consisted of a fcc NiCo phase. The bilayer bottom was either a pure (Ni,Co)O or a composite [NiCo+(Ni,Co)O] phase, depending on the percent of O2∕Ar ratio used during deposition. A double-shifted hysteresis loop exhibiting components that were from positive or negative coupling was observed in the NiCo∕(Ni,Co)O (8%O2∕Ar) bilayers. The microstructural changes, which result from a combination of deposition oxygen content and the ion-beam bombardment, will result in the unusual exchange bias behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.434
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicMagnetic properties of thin filmsFrench-language works237,207