Determining the Co-Efficient of End Constraint of Stretch Formed Microtruss Materials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microtruss cellular metals are a class of multifunctional materials, composed of a regular arrangement of supporting struts. They can be fabricated by stretching perforated metal sheets out of plane by applying force at strut intersections. Once fabricated, external loads are resolved axially along the struts resulting in stretch dominated deformation, yielding enhanced weight specific strength and stiffness at lower densities compared to conventional metallic foams. Given the slenderness of the struts making up the microtruss architecture, failure often occurs by inelastic buckling and is therefore dependent on the rigidity of the strut end constraints. During column buckling the limiting conditions are pin jointed (k=1) and rigid jointed (k=2), with microtruss struts typically having end constraints intermediate to these boundaries. Experimental and finite element methods were used to determine the value of k in IN600 microtrusses. Because of the non-linear stress-strain behavior of the parent metal, the relative significance of end constraint uncertainty is a function of the strut slenderness ratios and the material in question.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".