Using multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) to identify relationships between soil and corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) production properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over-application of agricultural fertilizers can contribute to degradation of surface water quality. Factors governing crop establishment and yield must be identified in order to efficiently manage N application rates in corn (Zea mays L.) production systems. Spatial data sets of corn establishment and grain yields, and soil physical and chemical parameters were obtained for two corn production systems on a poorly drained clay loam soil in eastern Ontario, Canada, during low yielding conditions in 2000. The multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) automated regression data mining method was used to determine the dominant factors affecting both crop establishment and yield from these data sets. The analysis using MARS suggests that soil water content and cone penetration resistance are more important than elevation and spring mineral soil N (NH 4 + + NO 3 − ) in predicting crop establishment and grain yield. The MARS approach proved to be a useful method for identifying relationships between potential yield-governing variables. It also helped elucidate potential cause and effect processes, and in so doing, helped identify areas within the field where soil physical parameters may have been more important than nutrients in governing corn yield. Key words: Mulitvariate adaptive regression splines, corn yield, cone penetration resistance, soil water content, soil N, topography
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".