Ofelia Garcia: Bilingual Education in the 21st Century: A Global Perspective.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a world where bilingualism is far more common than monolingualism, Ofelia García’s Bilingual Education in the 21st Century: A Global Perspective is the perfect demonstration of the need to widen the linguistic ideological lens used to interpret theories of bilingual education in order to fully embrace and reflect this reality. Even though it may be common knowledge to state that today’s world is becoming more multilingual and multicultural due to global socioeconomic, political, and technological developments, García’s book acknowledges this diversity and bilingualism as its norm and effectively shows the development of theories and practices of bilingual education as global and interrelated, yet complex and dynamic. Perhaps this development can be best represented by the beautiful banyan tree that graces the book’s cover: it is complex, constantly growing, and changing in various directions while stemming from sustainable and diverse social realities. At the very least, García takes the reader on a journey from the origins of the theories of bilingual education, to where the field stands today, and the heteroglossic path it should follow in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it