Les dilemmes éthiques en contexte de stage international : proposition d’un modèle de délibération qui intègre l’analyse intersectionnelle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La formation pratique dans un contexte international est de plus en plus recherchée par les stagiaires en travail social. L’École de travail social de l’Université de Moncton possède une tradition de plus de vingt-cinq ans à cet effet. Les stages internationaux suscitent des dilemmes éthiques nécessitant un encadrement qui assure une préparation et un accompagnement soucieux de la complexité des enjeux rencontrés. Le présent article propose un modèle de délibération éthique qui intègre les dimensions théoriques de l’analyse intersectionnelle en vue de l’accompagnement de stagiaires. Le modèle présenté cherche à contribuer à la réflexivité de façon à éviter des pratiques oppressives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".