Long‐term prediction of precipitation and hydrologic extremes with nonstationary oscillation processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nonstationary oscillations in climatic variables and indices have been the focus of many studies. Since climate indices or their associated hydrometeorological variables might contain nonstationary oscillation processes, it would be useful to be able to divide the intrinsic nonstationary oscillation into a finite number of components. Those components can then be used to predict the future system evolution. In the current study nonstationary oscillations of certain time series are extracted using a decomposition analysis called the empirical mode decomposition (EMD). In EMD the most important components are modeled with a nonstationary oscillation resampling (NSOR) technique. To predict a long‐term oscillation pattern, a time series with a long record is required. The normalized regional precipitation of eastern Canada is one such series. In a second example, the future evolution of extreme streamflows at two stations from the province of Quebec, Canada, is studied by using the long‐term patterns of climatic indices. Results indicate that the future long‐term patterns are well‐modeled with the NSOR and EMD. However, the indirect approach to finding the interconnection sometimes gives rise to a high prediction uncertainty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".