MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081560012 · doi:10.1021/la9910733

Reflection FTIR Studies of the Conformation of 2,2‘-Bipyridine Adsorbed at the Au(111) Electrode/Electrolyte Interface

2000· article· en· W2081560012 on OpenAlexaff
Manjali Hoon-Khosla, W. Ronald Fawcett, John D. Goddard, Weiquan Tian, Jacek Lipkowski

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryMoleculeCrystallographyConformational isomerismAb initioInfrared spectroscopySpectral lineBipyridineAtom (system on chip)Ab initio quantum chemistry methodsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Crystal structureOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Subtractively normalized interfacial Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (SNIFTIRS) has been employed to study the conformation of 2,2‘-bipyridine (22BPY) adsorbed at the Au(111) electrode surface. In addition, a b initio Hartree−Fock calculations were carried out to calculate the IR spectra for the trans -planar, cis- planar, and twisted conformations both for an isolated 22BPY molecule and for the molecule attached to a gold atom or ion. The spectra for the trans - and the cis -conformations were predicted to be distinctly different. The differences between the predicted spectra and the differences for most structural parameters between the cis- planar conformer and the torsional conformations with a twist of 0° to 40° between the two rings were small. SNIFTIRS spectra with a good signal-to-noise ratio were measured only for those potentials where the 22BPY molecules associate into stacks. Efficient packing into stacks requires a planar or very nearly planar conformation for the 22BPY molecules. For these potentials, the SNIFTIRS spectra provided direct evidence that 22BPY molecules coordinated to the surface gold atoms assume a cis - or nearly cis -conformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLangmuirSame topicElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207