MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081568890 · doi:10.1007/s11746-011-1997-3

Erratum to: Triacylglycerol Polymorphism: What Can We Learn from Space Groups and Crystalline Tendency?

2011· erratum· en· W2081568890 on OpenAlexaff
R. John Craven, Robert W. Lencki

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Oil Chemists Society · 2011
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchematicUnit (ring theory)Polymorphism (computer science)Space (punctuation)CombinatoricsStereochemistryMathematicsComputer scienceChemistryEngineeringMathematics educationBiochemistryAllele

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The caption for Fig. 1 should read “Schematic for a β and b β′ unit cells of achiral TAG and racemic mixtures of chiral TAG. Squares symbolize one unit cell, open circles symbolize one stereoisomer, circles containing commas symbolize the opposite stereoisomer and dashed line symbolizes a twinning operation. This scheme indicates the relative proportion (and not the total number) of molecules in the unit cell”.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Oil Chemists SocietySame topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchFrench-language works237,207