MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081581931 · doi:10.1007/s10496-009-0040-0

On weighted L p integrability and approximation of trigonometric series

2009· article· en· W2081581931 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalysis in Theory and Applications · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicDifferential Equations and Boundary Problems
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsTrigonometric seriesTrigonometrySeries (stratigraphy)Trigonometric polynomialPythagorean trigonometric identityTrigonometric integralTrigonometric substitutionProofs of trigonometric identitiesDifferentiation of trigonometric functionsInverse trigonometric functionsIntegration using Euler's formulaPure mathematicsMathematical analysisPolynomial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We generalize several classical results on the integrability of trigonometric series and relations among the best approximation and the coefficients of trigonometric series. Theorem 3 and Theorem 4 are the first results on the relations among the weighted best approximation and the coefficients of trigonometric series.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it