MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

NlCARAGUA: DEMOCRACIA ELECTORAL SIN CONSENSO SOCIAL

2012· article· es· W2081595318 on OpenAlexaff
Andrés Pérez-Baltodano

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de ciencia política · 2012
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Policies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical sciencePolitical economySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La vida política de nicaragua en el 2011 giró alrededor de las elecciones generales de noviembre, en las que se debatió la suerte del proyecto "cristiano, socialista y solidario" del Frente sandinista de Liberación nacional (FsLn) liderado por daniel Ortega.triunfó Ortega con un amplio margen, en medio de acusaciones de fraude.en realidad, el FsLn pasó por encima de la constitución y las normas que rigen el proceso electoral para alcanzar su contundente victoria.una explicación de la victoria de Ortega, sin embargo, también debe considerar las enormes debilidades de la oposición que no logró articular un discurso y una visión social congruentes con las necesidades del país.Ortega, por el contrario, logró capturar la imaginación de millones de nicaragüenses que se debaten en la pobreza.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score0.802

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de ciencia políticaSame topicSocial Sciences and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207