Large-Scale Characterization and Analysis of the Murine Cardiac Proteome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent advances in mass spectrometry and bioinformatics have provided the means to characterize complex protein landscapes from a wide variety of organisms and cell types. Development of standard proteomes exhibiting all of the proteins involved in normal physiology will facilitate the delineation of disease mechanisms. Here, we examine the wild-type cardiac proteome using data obtained from a subcellular fractionation protocol in combination with a multidimensional protein identification proteomics approach. We identified 4906 proteins which were allocated to either cytosolic, microsomal, mitochondrial matrix or mitochondrial membrane fractions with relative abundance values in each fraction. We subjected these proteins to hierarchical clustering, gene ontology terms analysis, immunoblotting, comparison to publicly available protein databases, comparison to 4 distinct cardiac transcriptomes, and finally, to 6 other related proteomic data sets. This study provides an exhaustive analysis of the cardiac proteome and is the first large-scale investigation of the subcellular location for over 2000 unannotated proteins. With the use of a subtractive transcriptomics approach, we have also extended our analysis to identify 'cardiac selective' factors in our proteome. Finally, using specific filtering criteria, we identified proteotypic peptides for subsequent use in targeted studies of both mouse and human. Therefore, we offer this as a major contribution to the advancement of the field of proteomics in cardiovascular research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".