MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081653879 · doi:10.1179/cmq.2002.41.2.219

Nickel in Structural Alloys

2002· article· en· W2081653879 on OpenAlex
Su Xu, W. R. Tyson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Metallurgical Quarterly · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFusion materials and technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetallurgyNickelMaterials scienceAusteniteAlloySuperalloyCarbideIntermetallicSofteningMicrostructureComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This review was prepared for presentation at the 13th Canadian Materials Science Conference held June 5 to 8, 2001 in Sudbury, Ontario – the heart of nickel production in Canada. Nickel has a wide application in structural and special purpose alloys such as stainless steels, superalloys and low alloy steels. The wide use of nickel is associated with its crystal structure and other metallurgical properties. Nickel has a face centered cubic (FCC) crystal lattice which provides a good matrix for high temperature structural applications and allows for the complex precipitation of coherent intermetallic compounds and carbides in Ni-base superalloys. In stainless steels, nickel stabilizes the austenitic phase and thereby improves the mechanical properties and ease of fabrication. It also improves the corrosion resistance of steels. Nickel is used as an alloying element in low alloy steels primarily because of its influence on phase diagrams (stabilizing austenite and increasing solubility of other alloy elements) and on deformation behaviour (improving low temperature toughness by promoting cross-slip and/or causing solution softening).Ce compte-rendu a été préparé pour présentation à la 13ième Conférence Canadienne de la Science des Matériaux qui a eu lieu du 5 au 8 juin 2001 à Sudbury, Ontario – le coeur de la production du nickel au Canada. Le nickel est grandement utilisé dans les aciers structurals et dans les alliages spécialisés, e.g. les aciers inoxydables, les superalliages et les aciers faiblement alliés. Cette utilisation importante du nickel est associée avec sa structure cristalline et autres propriétés métallurgiques. Le nickel a un réseau cristallin cubique à faces centrées (fcc), lequel fournit une bonne matrice pour les applications structurales à haute température et permet une précipitation complexe de composés intermétalliques cohérents et de carbures dans les superalliages à base de Ni. Dans les aciers inoxydables, le nickel stabilise la phase austénitique et, de cette façon, améliore les propriétés et facilite la fabrication. Il améliore également la résistance à la corrosion des aciers. Le nickel est utilisé comme élément d’alliage dans les aciers faiblement alliés premièrement à cause de son influence sur les diagrammes de phase (en stabilisant l’austénite et en augmentant la solubilité des autres éléments d’alliage) et sur le comportement de déformation (en améliorant la ténacité à basse température en promouvant le glissement transversal des dislocations et/ou en causant un adoucissement par mise en solution)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it