MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Study on Bridge Deck Link Slabs of Simply Supported Girder Bridges

2014· article· en· W2081656118 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced materials research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative concrete reinforcement materials
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Transportation of Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeckStructural engineeringSlabBridge (graph theory)GirderLink (geometry)Bridge deckEngineeringInternal forcesStress (linguistics)Computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accordingto the status of seriously early disease, the diseases investigation and causesanalysis were performed on bridge deck link slabs. The results show thattransverse cracks and pot holes are the main forms of diseases of bridge decklink slabs. The main reason of diseases for bridge deck link slabs is the lightstructure, mechanical complex, unclearly to the performance under force, anddifficult to guarantee the quality of construction. According to the causes ofdiseases, the linear elastic analysis was performed on bridge deck link slabunder loading. The formula of maximum tensile stress of concrete in bridge decklink slab is derived. The main factors affecting the internal force of bridgedeck link slab were analyzed. The suitable structure of bridge deck link slabsis proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it