MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081656667 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011680

Near-infrared Fabry-Perot imaging of Herbig-Haro energy sources: Collimated, small-scale H$\mathsf{_{2}}$ jets and wide-angled winds

2002· article· en· W2081656667 on OpenAlexaff
C. J. Davis, Luke Stern, T. P. Ray, A. Chrysostomou

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHerbig–Haro objectAstrophysicsOutflowAstronomyLine (geometry)Molecular cloudJet (fluid)Young stellar objectProtostarEmission spectrumCollimated lightStar formationSpectral lineGalaxyStarsOpticsLaserGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To search for further evidence of H2 line emission towards the central engines of Herbig-Haro (HH) flows we have obtained near-infrared Fabry-Perot images of eight Class I outflow sources (SVS 13 [HH 7-11], L 1551-IRS5, HH 26-IRS, HH 72-IRS, SSV 63E [HH 24C], SSV 63W [HH 24J], HH 34-IRS and HH 111-IRS) and two Class 0 sources (HH 24-MMS and HH 25-MMS). Elongated H2 emission (on scales of a few arcseconds) is detected from four of the Class I YSOs. These small-scale “jets” are associated with the base of more extended, parsec-scale HH outflows (and the “Molecular Hydrogen Emission Line” regions, or MHELs, discussed in Davis et al. [CITE]). In L 1551-IRS 5 we detect two jet components in H2; these may be the molecular counterparts of the two known optical jets from this binary protostellar system, or they may represent H2 excitation along the walls of a narrow, edge-brightened cavity. In addition to the small-scale MHEL jets, analysis of the data also suggests the presence of discrete molecular shock fronts formed along the jet axes close to the energy sources. In the most clear-cut example, SVS 13, we see an H2 knot at a distance of about 440 AU from the outflow source; assuming a flow velocity of ~200 km s-1, then the dynamical age of this molecular feature is only 10 yrs. In these data we also see evidence for both collimated jets and wide-angled winds from the same sources. Indeed, even in one of the two Class 0 sources, HH 25MMS, a poorly-collimated flow component seems to be present. A two-component wind model may therefore be appropriate for outflows from Class I (and possibly even Class 0) protostars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207