MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081666512 · doi:10.1109/pesmg.2013.6672552

Demand response potential of water heaters to mitigate minimum generation conditions

2013· article· en· W2081666512 on OpenAlexaffabout
Steven Wong, Sophie Pelland

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemand responseElectricityRenewable energyElectricity generationGreenhouse gasBase load power plantWork (physics)Environmental scienceWater heatingGreenhouseEnvironmental economicsComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringEngineeringPower (physics)EconomicsWaste managementElectrical engineeringDistributed generationMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During periods of low electricity demand, particularly when demand drops below baseload supply levels, a system operator can encounter difficulties in efficiently dispatching its generating units. Referred to as `minimum generation conditions (MGC),' these states are troublesome because they can lead to increased greenhouse gas emissions, depressed electricity prices, or additional barriers to renewables integration. This work explores the potential of using electric water heaters (EWHs), in a demand response (DR) role, to mitigate the number and severity of these MGCs. A detection method for finding MGCs is first applied to the system in Ontario, Canada. At 2018 renewables target levels, it was found that most MGCs would occur in the early morning of spring and fall. To significantly address this issue next generation EWHs employing DR would need a deadband of 10°C to enable the 800+MW required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207