MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2081685666 · doi:10.1139/f01-068

Offshore spawning and year-class strength of northern cod (2J3KL) during the fishing moratorium, 1994-1996

2001· article· en· W2081685666 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
John Anderson, George A. Rose

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGadusPelagic zoneFisheryFishingJuvenileGadidaeFecundityAtlantic codJuvenile fishBiologyStock assessmentDemersal zoneGeographyEcologyPopulationFish <Actinopterygii>Demography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two new surveys have been conducted in recent years to assess the status of the northern cod (Gadus morhua) stock (2J3KL). An offshore acoustic survey in spring sampled concentrations of spawning adults and estimated potential fecundity. A pelagic juvenile fish survey carried out in late summer measured cod year-class strength prior to settlement. Spawning biomass of offshore cod decreased from 11 700 t in 1994 to 2000 t in 1995 to 900 t in 1996 with a corresponding decrease in eggs spawned. This decline was mirrored in the distribution and abundance of pelagic juvenile cod. Natural mortality estimated between the egg and pelagic juvenile stages increased from –0.068·day–1 in 1994 to –0.084·day–1 in 1995 to –0.112·day–1 in 1996. The decline in year-class strength of cod appeared to result primarily from a reduction in the number of offshore spawners compounded by an increase in natural mortality during the egg and larval stages. The decline in spawners occurred 2 years after the implementation of a fishing moratorium and cannot be linked to fishing. The rapid decline in abundance of adult fish combined with increased natural mortality during the egg and larval drift is consistent with depensation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences→Same topicMarine and fisheries research→French-language works237,207→